Thursday 24 March 2016

AHPC 6 Bonus Round - The Duke of Monmouth


I had a few ideas for most of the bonus rounds, but the Gambler-Risk-taker was always going to be The Duke of Monmouth. Now I did consider this figure to be my Curtgeld as well and be the start of Curt's Nine Years War collection!!! but he's got enough on his plate at the moment, so he'll be added to my collection, with the Wild Bill Hickok figure from my previous post for my Curtgeld.

The figure is from Reiver Castings ,who make an excellent dynamic collection of NYW figures, they're a tad on the large side but still fit in well with Foundry and Warfare, but not with Front Rank!. I gotta admit I do much prefer Warfare minis, but I haven't managed to get any of their figures painted so far??


 James Scott, duke of Monmouth, byname (until 1663) James Fitzroy, or Crofts (born April 9, 1649, Rotterdam, Netherlands, died July 15, 1685, London, England), claimant to the English throne who led an unsuccessful rebellion against King James II in 1685. Although the strikingly handsome Monmouth had the outward bearing of an ideal monarch, he lacked the intelligence and resolution needed for a determined struggle for power.





Monmouth was the illegitimate son of King Charles II and Lucy Walter, who claimed to be the king’s wife; the two, however, had little contact after 1649. James was born in the Netherlands, where the couple had met as both sought refuge during the English Civil War; the conflict ended in 1651 with the defeat of Charles’s forces. Lucy and young James moved frequently, and in 1656 she took him to London. Within months of their arrival, the two were arrested and briefly imprisoned in the Tower of London by the republican government. After their release in 1656, Lucy and James journeyed to Flanders. In 1658 an agent of Charles kidnapped James and took him to Paris, where he was looked after by Lord William Crofts. Two years later Charles was restored to the throne, and in 1662 James was returned to England and installed at court as a favourite of the king. On February 14, 1663, Charles created him duke of Monmouth, earl of Doncaster, and Baron Scott of Tindale and made him a Knight of the Garter. On April 20, Monmouth was married to the wealthy Scottish heiress Anne Scott, countess of Buccleuch; they were created duke and duchess of Buccleuch, and he took the surname of Scott. Even at this early date some Englishmen viewed him as a possible successor to Charles. Since Monmouth was a Protestant, his political opportunities increased when Charles’s brother and acknowledged heir, James, duke of York, converted to Roman Catholicism about 1668.


Monmouth was made captain of the king’s guard in 1668 and admitted to the privy council in 1670. During the Anglo-Dutch War of 1672–74, he commanded English troops on the European continent. He became captain general of all the armed forces in England in 1678, and on June 22, 1679, he triumphed over the Scottish Presbyterian rebels at Bothwell Bridge, Lanark. Meanwhile, the succession to the throne had become a burning issue in England, where anti-papal hysteria had been aroused by rumours that the Catholics were plotting to seize power. Charles blocked all parliamentary attempts to exclude James from the royal inheritance, and in September 1679 he banished Monmouth from the kingdom. Nevertheless, the duke quickly returned in defiance of his father and set about building up a following. In this crisis Monmouth was championed for the succession by Anthony Ashley Cooper, earl of Shaftesbury, the leader of the anti-Catholic Whigs in Parliament. In 1682–83 Monmouth became involved in the Whig conspiracy against Charles and James, known as the Rye House Plot. Although pardoned for his part in this enterprise, he was banished from court and took refuge in the Netherlands early in 1684.



Upon the death of Charles II on February 6, 1685, the duke of York acceded to power as James II. Monmouth landed at Lyme Regis, Dorset, with 82 followers in June and quickly raised over 4,000 men, but he was unable to rally the gentry to his rebellion. On July 6 his army of peasantry was totally defeated on the plain of Sedgemoor, Somerset. He fled but was soon captured and beheaded.

35 comments:

  1. Very nice figure Ray, is he saying "Go on, pull my finger"?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice job! He looks rather pompous on that horse, doesn't he?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice work, Ray. I guess you are indeed a risk taker if you end up on the block! A pity to lose your hear with all that nice hair.
    I took my eye off the Painting Challenge - I need to go see how it all ended.
    Cheers,
    M

    ReplyDelete
  4. A splendid entry Ray and perfect choice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice, Ray congratulations on your blog being included in Miniature Wargames blog of the month

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Ken, I'm yet to get my hands on the mag yet.

      Delete
  6. "Hey! Yeah you! You want a piece of me!?"

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well done Ray. Duke of Monmouth a great general and changed the way we fight wars.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great paintjob + great historical background = splendid post!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Grea looking duke, Ray. He's made me rethink getting a haircut :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you'd look pretty cool, all them curls flowing out the back of your suit of armour?

      Delete
  10. Lookin' good, Ray. Love the horse and the jacket, too. Really, the entire piece is nicely done.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Nice work Ray! And I enjoyed the bit of history too.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Great colours, Ray, I loved how Oliver Jackson Cohen portrayed him in GREAT FIRE mini series if I'm not mistaken

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Afraid not Dez, he played Monmouth's uncle, and future King James, Duke of York.

      Delete
  13. Lovely mate. Always great to read a bit of history as well.

    Top notch post.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Really nice painted figure! And I see that after all those months I've not been active on blogger you still have a bottle with red paint! :-D

    Greetings
    Peter

    ReplyDelete